Roberto Mucciarini

IL FILO D'ORO

DELLA FILOSOFIA

The golden thread of philosophy

Extended Abstract

Illumanesimo — from the fusion of Umanesimo (Humanism) and Illuminismo (Enlightenment): Il filo d’oro della filosofia is the dialogue of the corpus of the eponymous philosophy with the great Western tradition.

This work presents the historical comparative phase of Illumanesimo: a systematic comparison between the philosophical theorem developed through decades of independent research and the major figures in the history of Western thought, from Socrates to French existentialism. The volume Il filo d’oro della filosofia — Gli incontri filosofici dell’Illumanesimo (2026) is organized into eight short essays, each devoted to a specific figure or thematic focus, and continues the path opened with Metafisica necessaria, where the dialogue was conducted with contemporary thinkers. Here the horizon widens to the entire tradition: Socratic maieutics, the great metaphysical architectures of Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus, the Christian synthesis of Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, Kantian criticism, Hegelian dialectic, Nietzsche’s nihilism, Heidegger’s existential analytic, and the three principal forms of French existentialism — Sartre, Camus, Merleau-Ponty.

The title declares the underlying thesis of the work: there exists a golden thread which, through crises and ruptures, binds the search for truth to the evolution of human consciousness. The journey across the centuries is not an exercise in philosophical historiography, but an act of ontological reconnaissance: Illumanesimo engages in dialogue with the giants of thought not to celebrate their myth, but to test whether its own theses stand up to comparison with a millennia-old tradition, measuring itself against that tradition as a culturally young yet philosophically structured proposal. In each essay, the encounter follows a recurring structure: presentation of the philosophical position under examination, identification of points of convergence and divergence with Illumanesimo, critical examination of the most relevant issues, and assessment of the capacity of the Illumanist framework to respond to the objections raised.

At the center of these encounters stands the CEFA (Campo Energetico di Forze Autocoscienti — Energy Field of Self-Aware Forces), brought into relation with the respective conceptions of the soul, of consciousness, and of the spiritual principle elaborated by the tradition. The substance of the proposal emerges in the conclusion of the work: Illumanesimo presents itself as heir to the two great pillars of modernity — Humanism and the Enlightenment — and, at the same time, as a movement beyond them, offering an instrument for consciously inhabiting the age of technology, in which the rapidity of transformations threatens to overwhelm our capacity to process our experiences and to preserve the relationship with our own interiority.

SOCRATES — TRADITION — CEFA — ILLUMANESIMO

1. Situating the Work within the Illumanesimo Corpus

Il filo d’oro della filosofia, the seventh volume of the Illumanesimo corpus, belongs to the concluding phase of the publishing project developed through the six preceding volumes: L’Illumanesimo (general synthesis of the paradigm), Esperienze (origin and nature of the human being), La Realtà (CEFA entities, universal Reality, and divine law), Il senso di ogni vita (existential and transformative dimension), CEFA — Proposta di indagine (methodological bridge toward scientific investigation), Metafisica necessaria (philosophical dialogues with contemporary thinkers). With this new volume, the author continues the comparative phase by bringing to light a continuous philosophical trajectory, one that begins with Socrates and concludes with the modern thinkers of existentialism, with the aim of highlighting convergences and differences between the Illumanist proposal and the historical journey of human thought.

The work arises from a precise conviction, declared in the introduction: a philosophical proposal, however articulated and internally coherent, acquires depth and credibility only insofar as it is willing to submit itself to comparison with the great traditions of thought. Precisely because of its ambition to propose a new ontology of the Real and a new understanding of the human being, Illumanesimo recognizes the need to test itself against the most authoritative voices in the history of philosophy. This is neither a history of philosophy nor a handbook of comparative philosophy, but a series of sustained engagements between the core principles of Illumanesimo and the positions of the philosophers who have indelibly marked reflection on being, consciousness, freedom, and the meaning of existence.

The volume thus assumes a twofold function within the Illumanesimo corpus: on the one hand, it completes the dialogical testing of the system — begun in the book L’Illumanesimo with the exchange between the proposal and fifteen contemporary currents, and continued in Metafisica necessaria with present-day thinkers — by extending it to the historical roots of Western thought; on the other, it makes explicit the position of Illumanesimo within a millennia-old continuity, that golden thread which makes us human and which the proposal intends to carry forward without interruption.

2. Structure and Thematic Organization

The work is organized into eight essays, arranged according to a criterion that is both chronological and thematic, preceded by a methodological introduction and followed by a conclusion, an index of authors, and a dedicated bibliography for each essay.

The first essay begins with Socrates, recognizing in maieutics and in the primacy of interiority the first major precursor to that centrality of self-awareness which Illumanesimo places at the heart of its own conceptual architecture. The essay first addresses the Socratic problem — the distinction between the historical Socrates and Plato’s literary character — and develops the encounter around the themes of the care of the soul, the relationship among knowledge, virtue, and happiness, the meaning of incarnate existence, and death as transition.

The second essay broadens the inquiry to the great metaphysical architectures of antiquity: with Plato, the relationship between the sensible world and the intelligible world; with Aristotle, hylomorphism and the intrinsic finality of being; with Plotinus, the question of emanation and of the Soul’s return to the One. In each of these encounters, the CEFA is brought into relation with the respective conceptions of the soul, of consciousness, and of the spiritual principle.

The third essay enters the heart of the medieval Christian tradition, through the dialogue with Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas. Augustinian interiority and the Thomistic synthesis of faith and reason compel Illumanesimo to clarify how its proposal differs from traditional theologies, while acknowledging a spiritual dimension of Reality.

The fourth essay shifts the encounter to the horizon of philosophical modernity with Immanuel Kant: the Copernican revolution, transcendental criticism, and the limits imposed on metaphysical knowledge represent a decisive challenge, in response to which Illumanesimo sets out to rehabilitate metaphysics not as a dogmatic system, but as a necessity inscribed in the very structure of human qualitative experience.

The fifth essay continues with Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: the dialectic, the triadic movement of Spirit, the concept of the Absolute, and the philosophy of history as the unfolding of rationality offer decisive convergences and divergences with respect to the Illumanist conception of Reality as a structured totality and of the CEFA as a self-aware entity.

The sixth essay addresses Friedrich Nietzsche and the radical challenge of nihilism: the death of God, the eternal return, the will to power, and the figure of the Übermensch. The encounter reveals how Illumanesimo embraces the Nietzschean diagnosis of the crisis without embracing its solution, proposing a renewed foundation for meaning that neither rests on traditional transcendent foundations nor dissolves into relativism.

The seventh essay is dedicated to Martin Heidegger and the existential analytic: Being-in-the-world, Being-toward-death, the question of technology, and the ontological difference between Being and beings constitute the terrain on which Illumanesimo specifies its own conception of death as an ontological passage and its own critique of technological dominion over consciousness.

The eighth essay, finally, extends the encounter to French existentialism in its three fundamental forms: the radical freedom of Jean-Paul Sartre, the absurd of Albert Camus, and the lived corporeality of Maurice Merleau-Ponty offer Illumanesimo the occasion to clarify its own conception of the relationship between freedom and necessity, between finitude and meaning, between the body and the CEFA.

The recurring structure of the essays — presentation, convergences and divergences, critical examination, assessment — also allows the reader to approach the work selectively, dwelling on the philosophers or themes of greatest interest without losing the thread of the overall discourse.

3. Fundamental Theses and Philosophical Positioning

The golden thread as ontological continuity. The thesis that gives the work its title affirms the existence of a deep continuity in the history of thought: the search for truth is bound, across the centuries, to the evolution of human consciousness. The great questions — what is the soul, and what care does it require? how does knowledge relate to virtue and happiness? what meaning does incarnate existence have? what happens after the death of the body? — persist intact throughout the tradition, from Plato’s early dialogues to twentieth-century existentialism. Illumanesimo consciously places itself within this continuity, putting itself forward as a third cultural turning point after Renaissance Humanism and the eighteenth-century Enlightenment.

The CEFA in relation to the philosophical tradition. The historical encounter makes it possible to specify the status of the CEFA with respect to the great conceptions of the soul: distinct from the Socratic-Platonic psychē while inheriting its primacy of interiority; irreducible to the Aristotelian form and to the Plotinian Soul while engaging with emanationism; different from the created soul of Christian theological traditions; not assimilable to the Hegelian Spirit as a single absolute subject, since CEFA entities are a multiplicity of individual entities, autonomous and free within universal Reality.

The rehabilitation of metaphysics. In response to Kantian criticism, Illumanesimo asserts the necessity of metaphysics as a structure inscribed in qualitative experience itself: not a dogmatic system claiming to know the unconditioned beyond the limits of experience, but a rational deduction proceeding from the irreducibility of the qualitative states of consciousness to materiality alone.

The response to nihilism. Illumanesimo embraces the Nietzschean diagnosis of the crisis of values without embracing its solution: the renewed foundation for meaning that it proposes neither rests on traditional transcendent foundations nor dissolves into relativism, but is rooted in the self-aware and evolutionary structure of Reality.

Death as ontological passage. Against Heideggerian Being-toward-death and the Camusian absurd, Illumanesimo proposes death as transition: the CEFA regains full freedom, takes stock of its earthly experience, and prepares for new experiences. The finitude of incarnation is not a condemnation, but the condition for a freely chosen experience directed toward knowledge.

Freedom and corporeality. In the encounter with French existentialism, freedom is not an absurd void but the property of a self-aware energy; the body is not mere facticity but an instrument for knowing material Reality, in accordance with the conception of incarnation as an evolutionary choice oriented toward knowledge.

4. Historical-Philosophical Positioning and Originality

The work explicitly presents itself as heir to the two great pillars of modernity and, at the same time, as a movement beyond them. Just as the fathers of Humanism placed the human being back at the center of a universe that was being discovered to be infinite, and just as the Enlightenment brought the light of reason to bear against the darkness of dogmatism, Illumanesimo proposes a revaluation of the original values of those movements — the centrality of the human being, the autonomy of critical reason, the rejection of dogmatisms — inserting them into a broader horizon that does not sacrifice the metaphysical dimension of existence, but recognizes it as necessary. If Kant defined the Enlightenment as humanity’s emergence from its self-incurred immaturity, Illumanesimo incorporates into its proposal the call to prepare individuals to free themselves from the suffocating state of technoscientific dependence they have helped to create — a dependence over which humanity risks losing control and, with it, the relationship with its own interiority.

The originality of the volume resides above all in its method: none of the works of the corpus had yet conducted a systematic and reasoned engagement with the entire arc of Western thought, from Socrates to Merleau-Ponty. Each essay avoids both erudite celebration and the reduction of Illumanesimo to an updated version of the doctrines examined: the encounter brings to light, through comparative analysis, the deep structures of a philosophical reflection that maintains a continuity of fundamental questions throughout its diverse historical articulations. The proposal does not replace the tradition: it carries it forward, testing whether its own positions stand up to comparison with that tradition.

5. Methodology and Argumentative Style

The comparative method adopted is characterized by historiographical rigor. The first essay, for example, begins by addressing the Socratic problem, distinguishing the sources — Plato’s early dialogues, the testimonies of Xenophon, Aristophanes, and Aristotle — and stating the selection criteria adopted. Each essay is accompanied by a dedicated bibliography integrating primary sources and critical literature, and the internal cross-references among the essays (with reference to sections and paragraphs) give the work an overall systematic coherence. Quotations from the volumes of the Illumanesimo corpus constantly ground the encounter in the foundational texts.

A methodological clarification runs through the entire work: no algorithm has generated or helped develop the contents of Illumanist philosophy, which remain the result of human research into altered states of consciousness, conducted since the mid-twentieth century through philosophical and scientific encounters and studies. Artificial intelligence is used exclusively as an analytical tool for linguistic and editorial support. This choice responds to the very nature of Illumanesimo, which does not present itself as a closed system impervious to criticism, but as a proposal open to dialogue and evolution.

6. Perspectives within the Illumanesimo Cultural Project

The conclusion of the work brings the historical encounter into the present. Humanity is living through a phase change that, for the first time in history, is unfolding at a speed that can be perceived in real time: rapidity emerges as the true malady of our time, undermining the very possibility of authentic and meaningful growth. The nausea of which the existentialists spoke is no longer an isolated metaphysical anguish, but the risk of a collective disorientation in the face of an acceleration that seems devoid of direction.

To respond to this challenge, Illumanesimo proposes three fundamental lines of action. The first is education aimed at coherence with one’s existential role: teaching individuals to recognize themselves as part of an individual existential project, according to an idea of education as leading forth — the kindling of a flame, not the filling of an empty vessel. The second is moving beyond the matter–spirit dualism: understanding that every technological change is an energetic change requiring an equivalent spiritual maturity. The third is the “Humanism of the threshold”: acting consciously as custodians of being, transforming speed from a threat into an opportunity for an evolutionary leap of consciousness.

These dialogues do not claim to bring the encounter to a close, but to open it further: the work offers itself as a space of dialogue among diverse philosophical traditions, between science and spirituality, between Western thought and Eastern traditions of wisdom, in the conviction that truth manifests itself in the plurality of voices and in the irreducible diversity of human experiences.

7. Conclusions

Il filo d’oro della filosofia ideally brings to a close the encounter with the great tradition of Western thought — while the comparative phase finds its completion in Oltre il nulla e la Gloria, dedicated to Emanuele Severino — demonstrating that the proposal did not arise in a theoretical vacuum, but is rooted in a millennia-old tradition whose fundamental questions it takes up while offering new answers. The specific contribution of the work resides in having shown the argumentative resilience of the system in its engagement with the giants of thought — from Socratic maieutics to the phenomenology of corporeality — and in having translated that encounter into a diagnosis of the present and a practical proposal for the age of technology.

Illumanesimo does not ask for an act of faith, but for an ontological acknowledgment: it proposes recognizing that freedom is the property of a self-aware energy — the CEFA — which must learn to govern its own vibration so as not to be overwhelmed by the background noise of technology. Not a destination, but a journey to be traveled with a method suited to inhabiting change: to be faster than chaos is the imperative of our time, and Illumanesimo offers itself as the instrument for doing so — without interrupting that long path represented precisely by the golden thread that makes us human.

Keywords: Illumanesimo; CEFA; golden thread of philosophy; Socrates; maieutics; Plato; Aristotle; Plotinus; Augustine; Thomas Aquinas; Kant; Hegel; Nietzsche; nihilism; Heidegger; French existentialism; metaphysics; self-awareness; Humanism; Enlightenment; age of technology.

Complete references to the volumes of the corpus are available on the Books page .

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

International license (CC BY 4.0).

Extended abstract also archived on Zenodo —

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18882370.

Translation Note. The English translation has been produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools and subsequently revised. In the event of any discrepancy, the original Italian text constitutes the sole authentic reference and shall prevail.

​